Back to Blog 中文 EN

Will AI Replace Engineers?
An Honest 2026 Answer

This piece won't tell you "no, relax," and it won't scare you with "yes, run for your life." I'm going to lay out what AI can genuinely do and what it can't — and then give you 8 engineer habits you can start today that will keep your bargaining power 5 years from now.

※ These observations are based on hands-on use of AI coding tools in 2025–2026 and publicly available industry information — not predictions of the future. AI may move faster than any article can keep up with.

Let's answer the most direct question first

"Will AI replace engineers?"

The question itself has a bug — it assumes "engineer" is a single job.

The reality: "engineer" is 10 different professions lumped under one name. AI will replace some of them, and won't replace others.

So the right question is: "The part of the work that I do — will AI replace that?"

This piece breaks it down for you — what AI can replace in 2026, what it can't, and how you can move yourself over to the side AI can't reach.


What AI can / can't replace in 2026

What AI can replace

  • Writing CRUD boilerplate code
  • Translating code from one language to another
  • Writing unit tests (for code that's already written)
  • Writing SQL queries / regex
  • Fixing simple lint / type errors
  • Drafting a README
  • Explaining an unfamiliar piece of code
  • Common algorithm problems (LeetCode Easy / Medium)
  • UI component boilerplate

What AI can't replace (in 2026)

  • Turning a fuzzy requirement into a concrete spec
  • Making architecture calls across competing trade-offs
  • Debugging problems that span services and teams
  • Reading the political context of "should this PR be merged"
  • Collaborating with PMs / designers / clients
  • Convincing the boss that a refactor matters more than a new feature
  • Onboarding new hires / reviewing other people's decisions
  • Reacting to a production incident + running the postmortem
  • Defining what "successful software" even means

See the pattern?

Everything AI can replace is "clear input, verifiable output" work.
Everything AI can't replace is "fuzzy input, requires judgment, you bear the consequences" work.

AI is "a tool that writes code," not "an engineer who builds products."
Those two things are worlds apart.

So why is everyone panicking

Because — for the past 30 years, 80% of the "engineer" job has been writing code.

Algorithm questions in interviews, writing CRUD once you're hired, fixing bugs, writing tests — most of the time went into "clear input, verifiable output" tasks.

AI is doing that part now. So the "old kind of engineer" really will be replaced.

But the "future engineer" will spend more time on the things AI can't replace — design, decisions, collaboration, postmortems.

This isn't "engineers getting replaced" — it's "the work that makes up the engineering job being reshuffled."

It's a bit like accountants 30 years ago, who spent 80% of their time crunching numbers. After computers arrived, accountants didn't disappear — their work shifted from "crunching" to "explaining, judging, ensuring compliance."

Engineers are going through the same thing.


Who gets left behind in the AI era

To put it bluntly — the following engineers will find it harder and harder to land a job:

  • Can only write code, no idea why it's written that way — AI writes it faster and never complains about overtime
  • Only follows the spec, never questions it — the spec itself might be wrong
  • Can't use AI tools — 5–10x less productive than colleagues who can
  • Poor at communication, just wants to head-down and write code — writing code keeps getting cheaper, communication keeps getting more expensive
  • No real production-system experience — AI can write a toy project, but not a system that holds up under traffic

Notice — not one of these 5 is "weak technically." Skill isn't what gets you left behind; how you're positioned is.

Who gets more valuable in the AI era

  • People who can define a fuzzy problem clearly — AI needs good prompts, and the person who can prompt well is the new bottleneck
  • People who can collaborate across teams — software gets cheaper, organizations get more complex
  • People who can decide between trade-offs — AI hands you 3 options, but someone still has to pick
  • People who can review what AI produces — AI writes fast but gets things wrong; you need someone who knows enough to gatekeep
  • People who can translate for clients/bosses — turning tech-speak into business-speak, and business-speak into a spec

Notice these 5 — they're all "abilities," not "technical skills."


8 ways to protect yourself you can start today

01 Treat AI as an "intern," not a "mentor"

A lot of engineers use AI with the attitude of "whatever it writes, I'll use." That's putting yourself in a position lower than the AI.

The right posture — AI is like an eager but inexperienced intern. It writes fast, makes mistakes, and needs you to review it.

  • For every chunk of code AI writes, ask yourself "why is it written this way?"
  • For every option AI gives, think "is there another way?"
  • Every time AI says "this should work," verify it yourself

That way AI is your tool, and you're not AI's switchboard operator.

02 Volunteer for the tasks "AI can't write"

Which tasks at your company can't AI write?

  • Designs that span multiple systems
  • Requirements the client can't articulate
  • Bugs that are hard to reproduce
  • Projects that need coordination across several teams
  • Refactoring a heap of legacy code

These tasks are grueling and don't show immediate results, but — they train you into the kind of person AI can't replace.

03 Learn to "define problems," not just "solve problems"

AI is great at solving "clearly defined problems."

So the bargaining power lies with — the person who defines the problem.

How to practice:

  • When you get a requirement, first write a 1-pager on "the problem as I understand it" and confirm it with the requester
  • When you see a bug, first write down "symptom / suspected cause / how to verify," then write the fix
  • Attach to every PR "why I solved it this way, which options I considered, and why I didn't pick them"

Do these for six months and you'll find yourself pulling away from the colleagues who "only write code."

04 Build up the skills "beyond software"

Hard skills (writing code) keep getting cheaper.
Soft skills (communication, design, business) keep getting more expensive.

My advice:

  • Learn 1 skill that has nothing to do with engineering (marketing, design, writing)
  • Write 1 technical post a week — force yourself to turn your thinking into something others can understand
  • Find chances to demo / present / facilitate a meeting

"Can write code + can communicate" will be worth 3–5x more in 2030 than "really strong at writing code" (this is a judgment from experience, not a statistic).

05 Get real production-system experience

AI has never shipped to production. It doesn't know what production smells like.

  • Deploy a small side project to the cloud yourself
  • Learn to read monitoring, logs, and error tracking
  • Live through "getting woken up at 2 a.m. to fix a bug" once (practice on your own side project)
  • Learn rollbacks, feature flags, A/B tests

AI can't give you this experience — it can only write code; it won't get paged out of bed alongside you.

06 Learn to review code, not just write code

The most important skill for the future engineer is — judging whether the code AI wrote is correct.

This skill takes practice:

  • Read PRs on open-source projects and watch how others review
  • Every time AI finishes writing, force yourself to leave 3 review comments
  • Regularly read classic code bases (kernels, frameworks)

If you can review, you're a senior engineer. If you can't, you're just a high-end prompt operator.

07 Develop a "business lens"

The thing engineers get stuck on most — seeing a problem as a "technical problem" while missing that it's actually a "business problem".

For example:

  • A user says "the site is slow" — the engineer thinks "optimize the SQL," when it might really be "marketing over-promised and set user expectations too high"
  • Support reports "people keep asking the same question" — the engineer thinks "build a chatbot," when really "the docs aren't clear"
  • Sales says "the report comes too late" — the engineer thinks "optimize the query," when really "nobody reads the report, so there's no need to compute it at all"

Engineers who can step out of the tech and see the business get seen as "having product sense," and their pay pulls 30–50% ahead of the average engineer (a judgment from industry experience).

08 Build in public, don't hide

The most counterintuitive thing in the AI era — the more technical you are, the more you need to be public.

Why? Because:

  • AI is making "people who can write code" more numerous, so the market noise goes up
  • Company HR increasingly screens résumés with AI, and AI favors people with a public footprint
  • A personal brand keeps you from being commoditized (everyone can write code, but only you have that point of view)

Do what?

  • Write technical posts (they don't have to blow up — write them for your future self)
  • Open-source small projects (they don't have to go viral — just having them is enough)
  • Occasionally share technical observations on LinkedIn / X
  • Keep in touch with colleagues (most career opportunities come from your network, not your résumé)

One last honest reminder

Whether AI replaces you or not — that's not something you'll see answered within 5 years. It happens slowly, like a frog in slowly boiling water.

So the most dangerous reaction isn't "anxiety" — it's "thinking it has nothing to do with me."

5 years ago we thought "if you can write code, you'll always have a meal on the table."
5 years from now we might think "being able to write code is no longer enough."
The inflection point of that shift is right now.

This article isn't here to scare you — it's here to get you to start moving how you position yourself from "the person who writes code" to "the person who turns problems into software."

That's exactly what I'm doing with my 100 days of Building in Public. Every two weeks I write a newsletter breaking down how I'm actually moving — the real, the painful, the wrong turns.

Don't want to figure out this path alone?

Subscribe to the newsletter — I'll turn every turning point of my 100 days of Building in Public into an SOP you can follow step by step. One email every two weeks, unsubscribe anytime.

Subscribe to the newsletter Talk through your situation on LINE

Further reading — Engineers in the AI Era series